Technology-assisted review (TAR)
In more depth
In common TAR workflows the model continuously learns from reviewer decisions and serves up the documents most likely to be responsive—an approach known as continuous active learning—until little relevant material remains unfound. TAR predates generative AI and relies on classification rather than text generation, which makes its accuracy measurable through statistical sampling. Courts have repeatedly accepted TAR when the process is transparent and validated, and negotiating TAR protocols with opposing parties is now routine in large matters.
Related terms
Educational information, not legal advice. AI terminology and tools change quickly; definitions reflect usage as of the last-updated date. For what bar associations and courts actually require of lawyers using AI, see legalaicompliance.help and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.